





| |
|
CHAPTER 2
PLATO, AND RATIONAL IMMORTALITY
|
The goal of the pre-Socratics was to gain an understanding of a world
where everything was constantly changing. Where we could never know
anything because once we knew it it would become something else. The two
polar opposites, Parmenides who said that change was not possible, and
Heraclites who said that what is, is change itself. However, the problem lies deeper than
this. The problem is that reason can never lead to knowledge because
reason is not concerned with truth but only with validity. Reason, therefore,
must begin with knowledge. If what we find in the world around
us is constantly changing we cannot have knowledge of it. But we do, and
that is the perennial problem of philosophy, how? When I began to study
philosophy the Catholic priest who was tutoring me told me that there are only
two kinds of philosophers in the world. Platonists and Aristotelians and
that once you understand the difference Philosophy will make sense to you.
|